Follow Dr. Mary

Read the
My new book: Waist Away features special sections on revving up your sex drive, staving off osteoporosis, conquering food addictions, and sailing through menopause. You’ll also get great advice and recipes from the biggest names in the nutrition world. If you’re ready to lose weight joyfully and live a life free of disease—in a delicious way that makes sense for yourself and the planet—this book is for you. Buy it here.

Archives

Weight Watching Through the Decades

The weight-loss giant Weight Watchers is replacing its’ Points plan with a new system under which fresh fruit and vegetables are zero points! Under Weight Watchers new Points system, dried fruits and starch vegetables such as potatoes and corn still have points assigned to them. Weight Watchers says it will help dieters realize that a 100-calorie apple is a better choice than a 100-calorie bag of chips. The overhaul is the biggest change for Weight Watchers in more than a decade.
Flo was interviewed by The New Yorker a few years ago, and made a huge blunder by talking openly about the Weight Watchers program when she thought she was done with her magazine interview. Her company expects dieters to fail. In fact, the average Weight Watchers client re-enrolls herself 16 times over her lifetime. Phenomenal failure, rather than raving success, by anyone’s measure. Oh wait. Except by the stockholder’s measure.
This recent modification to the Points Plan is getting closer to scientifically proved methods of weight loss and long term weight control. People who stay ‘naturally thin’ eat a wide variety of vegetables, excepting potatoes. This program modification would be perfect if it included only vegetables, but it is a huge move in a healthy direction for a program that needs a facelift.

Weight Watching, Over the Decades
The weight-loss giant Weight Watchers is replacing its’ Points plan with a new system under which fresh fruit and vegetables are zero points! Under Weight Watchers new Points system, dried fruits and starch vegetables such as potatoes and corn still have points assigned to them. Weight Watchers says it will help dieters realize that a 100-calorie apple is a better choice than a 100-calorie bag of chips. The overhaul is the biggest change for Weight Watchers in more than a decade.
Flo was interviewed by The New Yorker a few years ago, and made a huge blunder by talking openly about the Weight Watchers program when she thought she was done with her magazine interview. Her company expects dieters to fail. In fact, the average Weight Watchers client re-enrolls herself 16 times over her lifetime. Phenomenal failure, rather than raving success, by anyone’s measure. Oh wait. Except by the stockholder’s measure.
This recent modification to the Points Plan is getting closer to scientifically proved methods of weight loss and long term weight control. People who stay ‘naturally thin’ eat a wide variety of vegetables, excepting potatoes. This program modification would be perfect if it included only vegetables, but it is a huge move in a healthy direction for a program that needs a facelift.

Related posts:

2 comments to Weight Watching Through the Decades

  • Polly

    Over my years with WW, this change is not completely new. Years ago there were no points. There wasn’t even butter. The best thing about WW is that for many people it is the only nutrition education they ever get. And if one stays with WW and does not deviate, even the old old program it works. The big thing is that WW does not advertize their program as a diet but a change in eating style. So WW does a lot of good for a lot of people , and thoes that have to come back come back because they know if they follow WW guidelines they do lose weight!

  • drmarymd

    It’s hard to get lasting results with portion control, because it is so hard to maintain smaller portions rather than change choices. It is great to see a program change over time to accomodate the new weight loss information.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>